Scientific Controversy

In the world of modern medicine, we encounter standardized testing and treatments, routine physical exams, and step-by-step healing and rehabilitation procedures in order to solve any health problems we may face. We call these methods “Conventional Medicine, or allopathic, and use them as a first resort when diagnosing and treating an illness. Alternatively, there are other forms of medicine that deviate from the ‘conventional’ path and take holistic and traditional approaches to healing the body. This realm of medicine is known as “Alternative” or Complementary”. Due to the differences in scientific validity, safety and regulation, and treatment modalities, patients, doctors, and supporters of either side have clashed over which route is considered best for treatment and should be promoted in the world of healthcare.  

To bridge this gap between holistic and allopathic medicine would be to allocate more funding to research and trials dedicated to finding the evidence for the efficacy of various alternative medicinal practices, which can potentially expand the palette of treatment options available to patients of various natures.

Works Cited: 

Tabish S. A. (2008). Complementary and alternative healthcare: Is it evidence-based? International Journal of Health Sciences, 2(1), V–IX. 

Skip to toolbar